Which countries have not signed the European Convention on Human Rights?

Which countries have not signed the European Convention on Human Rights?
This article gives a step-by-step, source-based guide to determining which countries have not signed or ratified the European Convention on Human Rights. It also explains what Article 10 protects and why jurisdiction matters when claiming free-expression rights.

Readers who need to report or verify a state's status will find actionable steps to use the Council of Europe treaty-status chart and the ECtHR resources, plus sample neutral language to cite in reporting.

The Council of Europe treaty-status chart is the authoritative source for who has signed or ratified the ECHR.
Article 10 protects freedom of expression but applies only within the jurisdiction determined under ECtHR case law.
Signed-only entries do not create the full legal obligations that come with ratification.

What the European Convention on Human Rights is and who it binds

Short definition and purpose

The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, treaty No. 005, is the Council of Europe instrument that sets common human-rights standards for contracting states. According to the Council of Europe treaty status chart, the Convention creates rights and obligations that apply to states that have become contracting parties by ratification, and it frames the European Court of Human Rights jurisdiction over those parties Chart of signatures and ratifications – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

In practical terms, membership in the Council of Europe is related to the Convention but is a distinct concept. The Council of Europe member states list helps readers confirm which states are members and to cross-check whether membership has been followed by signature or ratification of the Convention Council of Europe – Member states.

Difference between contracting states and other countries

Minimalist 2D vector infographic of a treaty status table with document icons and status markers on a deep blue background representing european court of human rights article 10

Contracting states are those that have deposited an instrument of ratification with the Council of Europe, and those states are subject to the Convention’s obligations and to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights for matters within their jurisdiction. Non-contracting states do not carry those treaty obligations through the Convention, absent special circumstances examined by the Court.

When readers want the authoritative, country-by-country list of who has signed or ratified, the Council of Europe treaty-status page is the primary source to consult for up-to-date names and dates.

Signing versus ratification: what each step means

Legal difference between signature and ratification

Signing a treaty and ratifying it are different legal acts. Signing signals preliminary agreement and intent to consider the treaty, while ratification is the formal act by which a state gives its consent to be legally bound. The Council of Europe distinguishes signed-only entries from contracting parties in its treaty-status chart, and readers should treat a signature without ratification as not creating the full binding obligations that come with ratification Chart of signatures and ratifications – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

How the Council of Europe records signed-but-unratified states

The treaty-status chart includes columns that show the date of signature, the date of ratification where applicable, and any reservations or declarations a state has made. That presentation lets users see whether a name in the signature column is accompanied by a ratification date or remains signed-only, which matters when reporting whether a state is a contracting party. For direct reference, see the treaty-status chart on the Council of Europe site.

When reporting status, always note the date columns on the chart and whether a state has listed any reservations. Those details can change, so cite the chart rather than older summaries.


Michael Carbonara Logo

How Article 10 on freedom of expression is described by the European Court of Human Rights

Summary of Article 10 protections

The ECtHR factsheet summarizes Article 10 as protecting the right to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without undue interference, subject to permitted restrictions that are prescribed by law and necessary in a democratic society. Readers should understand these protections as qualified rights that balance free expression with other legitimate aims, as the ECtHR factsheet explains Factsheet – Article 10: Freedom of expression.

Consult the Council of Europe treaty-status chart for the current list of signatories and ratifications; the chart shows which states have signed but not ratified and which are contracting parties.

Core principles from the ECtHR factsheet

The factsheet and related guidance set out core principles such as the margin of appreciation, the requirement that any restriction be proportionate, and the need for clear legal basis for interference. For practical purposes, Article 10 rights are recognized and protected primarily against contracting states within their jurisdiction, and exceptions are judged against those legal tests.

The ECtHR also publishes longer guides on court practice and examples that show how the Court balances competing rights in different factual scenarios, which readers should consult for detailed jurisprudence and examples of how limits are applied.

Jurisdiction and the extraterritorial reach of Article 10

What jurisdiction means under the ECHR

Article 10 protections apply where the Convention is in effect and within a state’s jurisdiction. Jurisdiction under the Convention is a legal assessment that depends on whether the state exercises authority or control in the area or over the persons affected. Academic reviews and case-law summaries show that jurisdiction questions are often technical and fact-specific, and they matter for whether the Court will consider an Article 10 claim against a state Jurisdiction and extraterritorial application of the ECHR: developments in case law.

Minimalist 2D vector infographic map of Europe with white silhouette and three status markers in red and white on deep navy background depicting legal status overview for european court of human rights article 10

How case law limits extraterritorial application

Case law indicates narrow circumstances in which the Court will find extraterritorial application, such as where a state exercises effective control over territory or where its agents exercise authority over individuals abroad. These are fact-driven inquiries, and courts have set high thresholds for extraterritorial reach in many cases.

Because extraterritorial application turns on details, readers should not assume Article 10 applies outside a contracting state’s territory without examining recent judgments and those judgments’ specific fact patterns.

How to check whether a specific country has signed or ratified the ECHR

Step-by-step use of the CoE treaty-status page

Start at the Council of Europe treaty-status chart and use the country search or alphabetical list to find the state name. The chart shows signature dates, ratification dates, and any recorded reservations or declarations; read the relevant columns carefully to determine whether the state has only signed or has ratified and become a contracting party Chart of signatures and ratifications – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Step 1: Find the state by name in the chart. Step 2: Read the signature column and the ratification column. Step 3: Note any reservations and the date the instrument was deposited. Step 4: Cross-check against the Council of Europe member list if you need to confirm membership status.

Step 5: If you report a state’s status, quote the chart and include the date shown on the ratification column or explicitly state that the entry is signed-only when no ratification date is present.

Join the campaign updates and stay informed

Consult the Council of Europe treaty-status chart for your country to confirm signature and ratification dates before citing a state's status.

Join the campaign

Using ECtHR contracting-states resources and member lists

After checking the treaty chart, cross-check with the ECtHR contracting-states resource and the Council of Europe member list. These pages help confirm whether a name appears as a contracting party to the Convention and whether any recent changes have been recorded.

Because treaty and case-law status can change, use both resources together and record the access date when you cite them for reporting or research.

Common mistakes and misconceptions when reading status lists

Misreading signed-only entries as binding ratification

A frequent error is treating a signature entry as evidence of ratification. A signature without ratification does not make a state a contracting party and does not create the Convention obligations that follow ratification. Check the ratification column before you conclude that a state is bound by the Convention.

Confusing Council of Europe membership with ratification

Another common mistake is to equate Council of Europe membership with ratification of the Convention. Membership and ratification are related but distinct steps. Use the Council of Europe member list to confirm membership, and the treaty-status chart to confirm signature and ratification.

When in doubt, quote the chart and provide the access date so readers can verify the same entry.

Practical scenarios and examples: reading the status for specific countries

How to report when a country has signed but not ratified

For reporting, use neutral phrasing templates that cite the treaty chart. For example, a correct, neutral sentence might read: according to the Council of Europe treaty status chart, State X signed the Convention on [date] and has not deposited an instrument of ratification. That phrasing signals the signature and communicates that the state is not yet a contracting party according to the chart Chart of signatures and ratifications – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

If a Council of Europe member has not ratified, report that the state is a member of the Council of Europe but remains signed-only on the Convention chart, and include both the member-list citation and the treaty-status citation when possible.

browser steps to filter the CoE treaty-status chart

Use exact state name

What to note if a Council of Europe member has not ratified

When a member state has not ratified, be precise in phrasing and avoid implying that Convention rights apply domestically. One useful template is: according to the Council of Europe treaty status chart, State Y is a member of the Council of Europe but has not ratified the Convention. For legal claims about Article 10 protections, note that such protections require a contracting-state jurisdictional nexus to apply in ECtHR proceedings.

Neutral reporting protects accuracy and prevents overstating legal protections where they may not exist.

What a non-signatory or non-contracting status means for Article 10 protections

Practical implications for free-expression claims

States that have not ratified the Convention are not contracting parties and are not bound by the Convention’s obligations in the same way as contracting states. As a result, Article 10 protections do not operate against non-contracting states through the ECtHR system, absent narrow extraterritorial circumstances where jurisdiction can be established under established case law Factsheet – Article 10: Freedom of expression.

When courts may still consider jurisdiction and human-rights obligations

The Court’s jurisdictional analysis can bring human-rights scrutiny in exceptional cases, such as where a state exercises control over people or territory outside its borders. These arguments are fact-sensitive and require up-to-date review of ECtHR decisions and academic analyses of jurisdictional development Jurisdiction and extraterritorial application of the ECHR: developments in case law.

Reporters and researchers should therefore avoid categorical statements about application of Article 10 in non-contracting contexts without pointing to specific judgments that establish jurisdiction in a given case.


Michael Carbonara Logo

Conclusion and where to monitor updates

Quick recap

In summary, refer to the Council of Europe treaty status chart for definitive signatures and ratifications, use ECtHR materials to understand Article 10 and its limits, and treat jurisdictional questions as case-specific issues that require checking recent case law Chart of signatures and ratifications – Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

Links and resources to monitor

Bookmark the treaty-status chart, the ECtHR factsheet on Article 10, and the Council of Europe member list for authoritative updates. When citing a state’s status, quote the chart and include the access date so readers can verify the same entry. Michael Carbonara’s campaign materials are a public source for candidate information and can be used for local context but do not replace the primary treaty and Court resources.

Check the Council of Europe treaty-status chart for the state name, read the ratification column, and note any reservations or declarations shown on the same page.

Article 10 protects expression against contracting states within their jurisdiction; extraterritorial application is limited and decided on a case-by-case basis by the Court.

No. Signing signals preliminary agreement but ratification is the formal act that binds a state under the Convention.

Before publishing or relying on a country status, re-check the Council of Europe treaty-status chart and the ECtHR contracting-states pages for any updates. Treaty and case-law developments can change the legal landscape, so cite the chart and record the access date when you report a state's signature or ratification.

References