What is the primary role of business in our society?

What is the primary role of business in our society?
This explainer clarifies what voters should expect from businesses and how to evaluate claims about corporate responsibility. It draws on international reporting and mainstream governance frameworks to link research to practical questions that matter in local elections.

The goal is practical: help readers distinguish direct economic roles such as job creation and tax contributions from broader social responsibilities like innovation, community partnerships and transparent governance. The focus is on evidence and primary sources.

Businesses provide most paid work and contribute taxes and investment that support public services.
Private R&D can create broad benefits but often requires public policy and collaboration to scale those gains.
International guidance emphasizes transparency, stakeholder engagement and due diligence as expected corporate practices.

What we mean by business and society

Definitions: firm, private sector, public goods

In this article, “business” refers to private firms that produce goods and services and employ people, from local sole traders to multinational companies. The discussion treats employers and producers as central economic actors while distinguishing their core market functions from broader social roles such as community engagement and the provision of public goods.

The responsibility of business to the society includes both direct economic roles and broader contributions, but those categories are distinct: direct functions include jobs, output and tax contributions; broader roles include innovation, local partnerships and voluntary social programs. Readers should note that supplying public goods often remains primarily a role for public institutions rather than private firms.

For basic employment and jobs context, international labour reporting shows that private firms are the dominant source of paid work in many countries, which is central to how business relates to communities and households World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024

Join the campaign conversation and stay informed

Read the scenarios and checklist below for clear examples you can use when evaluating candidate statements.

Sign up to join the campaign

Scope: local business vs multinational effects

Local businesses often contribute through direct hiring and community partnerships, while multinationals affect tax bases, supply chains and cross-border investment. The scale and mechanisms differ, and so do the expectations placed on each type of firm.

Where a company operates matters for which responsibilities are most relevant to voters, for example neighbourhood job creation versus global due diligence in supply chains.

How businesses drive employment, output and public revenue

Employment and labour-market effects

Private-sector firms remain the primary source of paid employment globally, and labour-market trends emphasize the central role of employers in shaping job quality and training needs, according to international reporting World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024

That employer centrality means business behavior-hiring, wages and workplace training-affects household incomes and local labour-market resilience. Voters evaluating claims about job creation should look for clear attributions to firms and supporting data rather than slogans.

Tax revenue and economic output

Business activity generates economic output, investment and tax revenue that underpin public services in most countries, so the private sector is a main driver of the resources governments use for schools, infrastructure and health services World Bank jobs overview

When candidates or firms discuss contributions to public services, it is useful to distinguish direct fiscal flows such as corporate taxes from voluntary or philanthropic support that does not replace public funding.

Business, innovation and public goods

R&D, innovation and spillovers

Firms often invest heavily in research and development, and this private investment can produce innovations that spill over into broader societal benefits when shared or adopted more widely.

Vector infographic of a small storefront and nearby commercial buildings with icons showing local economic impact and responsibility of business to the society

These spillovers are a central reason analysts treat business R&D as a source of both commercial products and potential public goods, though translating private innovation into broad public benefit commonly requires public support or policy interventions OECD corporate governance page

Private R&D can lead to public benefits when innovations diffuse through markets, public procurement, or collaborative research, but scaling those benefits typically requires public policy support, governance and safeguards.

Public-private collaboration that scales benefits

Public-private collaboration, such as joint funding for research or public procurement that adopts private innovations, is a frequent mechanism by which private invention becomes more widely available. These collaborations can increase the scale of benefits but also raise questions about governance and access.

Because measuring the broader social returns from private R&D is complex, many analysts caution against assuming private innovation will automatically produce public goods without complementary policy measures Creating Shared Value: Harvard Business Review

International guidance and governance: what mainstream frameworks say

OECD corporate governance recommendations

International guidance in the mid-2020s highlights stakeholder engagement, transparency and due diligence as expectations for corporate behavior rather than legally binding rules in most jurisdictions OECD corporate governance page (see OECD responsible business conduct).

The OECD materials are used by policymakers and firms as a reference for good practice, but they are normative tools that require national policy and enforcement to have legal effect.

UN Global Compact principles

The UN Global Compact sets out principles on human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption that companies can adopt to align with broader social goals, and many firms refer to this framework when describing their approaches to stakeholders UN Global Compact (see the Ten Principles).

Readers should treat statements of alignment with these principles as commitments to follow certain norms, and then check for transparent reporting or third-party verification to assess follow-through.

CSR and shared-value approaches as practical frameworks

Definitions: CSR vs shared value

Corporate social responsibility typically refers to voluntary practices where companies manage social and environmental impacts, while shared-value approaches aim to align business strategy with social outcomes that also improve competitiveness.

Both frameworks are widely adopted in management practice as ways for firms to address social concerns without abandoning commercial goals.

Evidence on business outcomes

Meta-analytic evidence and foundational studies find a positive association between corporate social performance and certain firm outcomes, though causality and measurement limits are often noted by researchers Journal of Management Studies meta-analysis

Minimal 2D vector infographic with four white icons for jobs taxes innovation and governance on navy background with red accents illustrating responsibility of business to the society

Practically, many companies report CSR programs and shared-value initiatives, but voters and analysts should look for measurable goals and transparent data rather than broad claims.

Measuring social outcomes: challenges and open questions

Why measurement is hard

Measuring social impact involves attribution problems, differences in metrics across firms and sectors, and difficulties in comparing outcomes over time and geography.

Without common standards, claims about social impact can be hard to verify, which is why current reporting reforms emphasize shared metrics and clearer disclosures World Bank jobs overview

Current priorities: common metrics and standardization

Policy discussions in the mid-2020s prioritize creating common metrics and reporting standards so that investors, regulators and voters can compare performance and hold companies accountable.

Standardization is expected to improve comparability but requires agreement across regulators, industry and civil society to be meaningful OECD corporate governance page

How to evaluate a company’s responsibilities: a simple decision framework

Criteria to consider: legal, economic, social

A practical decision framework asks whether a company complies with legal requirements, reports transparently on outcomes, engages stakeholders and sets measurable goals tied to policy-relevant outcomes.

Voters can apply these criteria to candidate statements by requesting clear evidence, such as public filings or third-party assessments, rather than accepting slogans.

A short checklist to apply responsibility criteria to a company or claim

Use public documents where possible

Questions voters can ask about policy and corporate behaviour

Ask for specific metrics, timelines and primary sources; for example, request the public filing or report that documents a claimed number of jobs or an impact metric.

Comparing a firm’s stated commitments to independent reporting and regulatory filings provides a clearer picture than campaign statements alone OECD corporate governance page

Policy levers: how regulation and incentives matter

Skills, workforce development and incentives

Experts recommend strengthening skills and workforce development policies that help align employer hiring with local labour-market needs, a theme emphasized in international reporting on jobs and skills World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024

Public policy can create incentives for firms to invest in training and long-term workforce skills without removing responsibility for essential public services from government.

Balancing short-term competitiveness and long-term investment

Policymakers and firms face a trade-off between short-term cost pressures and longer-term investments in sustainability or workforce development; well-designed incentives can shift the balance toward longer-term social investment.

Analysts caution that effective incentives combine clear metrics, time horizons and a regulatory backstop to prevent underinvestment in public goods World Bank jobs overview

Common mistakes and trade-offs to watch for

Overclaiming social impact

One common error is attributing public outcomes solely to corporate actions without considering other factors such as government policy or community efforts.

Look for independent verification and avoid accepting claims that lack measurable indicators or clear attribution to company activity OECD corporate governance page

Short-term focus vs long-term investment

Another trade-off is prioritizing near-term competitiveness over long-term social and environmental investments, which can create risks for communities and future growth.

Evaluating corporate plans should include an assessment of time horizons and whether commitments are backed by measurable budgets and milestones.

Practical examples: small business, tech firm and multinational scenarios

Local small business: community ties and jobs

A local small business typically influences its community through payroll, local purchasing and partnerships with schools or charities; these activities directly affect neighbourhood employment and resilience.

Voters should expect concrete commitments from small businesses such as apprenticeship offers or local supplier programs rather than vague pledges.

Tech firm: R&D and data responsibility

A tech firm example shows how R&D can produce innovations with broad benefits, but also raises issues such as data responsibility and equitable access that require policy oversight.

When tech firms claim public-value outcomes, voters should ask how the innovation will be governed and whether safeguards exist for privacy and fair access Creating Shared Value: Harvard Business Review

Multinational: tax, supply chains and due diligence

Multinationals raise questions about tax contributions, supply-chain labor standards and cross-border due diligence; international guidance increasingly expects firms to manage these responsibilities proactively.

Transparent reporting on tax, audits of suppliers and adherence to due-diligence frameworks are practical signs that a multinational is treating its obligations seriously UN Global Compact

Employer responsibilities and labour-market expectations

Wage, benefits and training responsibilities

Employers affect local labour markets through wages, benefits and training; these choices influence worker welfare and local economic stability and are central to understanding the responsibility of business to the society.

The ILO and World Bank reporting underline the role of employers in shaping job quality and skills development, which in turn affects community resilience World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024

Role in local labour-market outcomes

Local hiring practices, investment in apprenticeships and support for retraining are practical levers employers can use to strengthen regional labour markets.

Policy can support these initiatives with targeted funding, tax incentives or public training programs that complement private actions World Bank jobs overview

Public-private collaboration: scaling private contributions without offloading public duties

Partnership models and guardrails

Common partnership models include co-funded R&D, public procurement that scales private innovation and social impact contracts where government pays for measurable outcomes.

Such models can expand benefits, but they work best when clear guardrails protect public interest and when due diligence and stakeholder engagement are enforced OECD corporate governance page

When private contributions supplement but do not replace public responsibility

Private contributions can supplement public services, for example by funding pilot programs, but they should not be presented as substitutes for sustained public investment in essential services.

International guidance recommends safeguards so private engagement enhances rather than replaces public responsibility UN Global Compact

Three questions voters can ask candidates about business and community responsibility

How to judge promises and policy proposals

Ask candidates for the primary sources that back their claims: which public filings, reports or third-party audits provide evidence for a stated number of jobs, investments or impact metrics.

Demanding primary sources helps separate verifiable commitments from rhetorical claims and links candidate promises to measurable evidence World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024

What evidence to request from candidates

Three practical questions voters can ask are: what measurable metrics will you use, what independent source verifies the claim, and how will stakeholders be consulted during implementation.

These questions focus discussion on attribution and governance rather than slogans, and they point to public filings or specialist reports as validation sources World Bank jobs overview

Summary: key takeaways for voters

Short checklist of evidence-based points

Businesses play core roles in job creation, economic output and tax revenue, and they are major sources of innovation, yet public institutions remain essential for providing and financing public goods World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2024

International guidance from the OECD and UN Global Compact stresses stakeholder engagement, transparency and due diligence as expectations for corporate governance, and these documents are useful reference points when assessing candidate or corporate claims OECD corporate governance page (see OECD guidelines here).

Where to learn more and verify claims

Primary sources to consult include the ILO report on employment trends, World Bank publications on jobs, the OECD corporate governance guidance and the UN Global Compact materials, and for related commentary see the Michael Carbonara homepage, the issues page and the about page.

Voters should prioritize primary documents and public filings when checking candidate statements or corporate claims rather than relying on secondhand summaries.


Michael Carbonara Logo


Michael Carbonara Logo

It means assessing how firms affect jobs, wages, local investment and community partnerships, and checking whether claims are supported by public filings or independent reports.

Businesses can supplement services through partnerships or funding, but essential public services are normally the responsibility of government and require public accountability.

Ask for primary sources such as public filings, third-party audits or reputable reports, and look for measurable metrics and transparent reporting.

Businesses play important economic and social roles, but voters should treat corporate claims with scrutiny and seek primary evidence. Evaluating candidate statements using public filings and established international guidance helps keep the focus on measurable commitments.

Ultimately, business contributions matter to communities, but they do not replace the public functions that elected officials are accountable to provide.